AIDS
Where Did HIV
and AIDS Come From?
AIDS is a syndrome based upon
blood counts and the presence of certain diseases (the “opportunistic
infections.”) There are no specific
AIDS symptoms since AIDS includes a large number of diseases. AIDS occurs when your immune system finally
gives up the fight against HIV. Most
HIV positive people, without treatment, will develop AIDS within 10 to 15 years
following infection. The opportunistic
infections are what frequently leads to the death of those who suffer from
AIDS. Being HIV positive does not mean
you have AIDS, nor does it necessarily mean you ever will develop AIDS. Unfortunately, because they never got
tested, many people do not realize they are HIV positive until they develop
AIDS, and have infected many other people in the mean time.
Where Did HIV and AIDS Come From?
Well, the short answer is no one
really knows. The most common theory is
that it was transferred from monkeys to humans during a hunting party (i.e. the
monkey’s blood infected a person, and that just happened to be a virus that
liked both monkeys and humans), but that is just a theory. Other theories exist, some far fetched (a
big government conspiracy) to more reasonable (a different, usually harmless,
virus mutated and became HIV). If we
were ever able to really determine where it came from, it may mean a great deal
in trying to fight it, but at this point, it’s unlikely we’ll ever know for
sure.
There has been a debate about
this over the years, but that debate has basically died down now. When HIV was first discovered, people where
skeptical that HIV actually caused AIDS, but after all these years, there has
been significant amount of data and research to support that HIV does, in fact,
cause AIDS. Not to mention, there has
never been a case of an HIV negative person developing AIDS. The argument that HIV does not cause AIDS
was more-or-less based on the assumption that it was the drugs themselves that
cause AIDS and that HIV is harmless.
Again, research has shown that people who are on treatment do not
develop AIDS, or at least take longer to develop AIDS than people who are not
on treatment. Yes, there are still
people out there that believe the old theories, but there are also people out
there that think the X-files is a documentary series, but that doesn’t make it
true.
This is an idea that was much
more prevalent in the early days of the epidemic than it is now, but there are
still people out there that think the disease is a punishment from God for
homosexuals and drug users. I have
always found this a very disturbing idea.
First of all, when looking at theology, God is usually not very
wrathful, and when he is, it’s not arbitrary.
It is a fact that babies do get HIV and AIDS; however, lesbians are
considered one of the lowest risk groups.
To me, that kind of shoots that punishment theory right out the
window. Another thing to take into
consideration is that world-wide, the vast majority of HIV infections are due
to heterosexual sex, not homosexual sex or drug use. While it is true that in the U.S., the majority of HIV infections
remain in the gay male population, heterosexual transmissions are the fastest
growing group of new infections. Also,
the last time I checked, God wasn’t considered malevolent, but was supposed to
be the epitome of benevolence. Striking
people with a lengthy and painful disease as a punishment doesn’t seem to me as
being particularly benevolent.